Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment and nursing care problems related to the type of urinary diversion in terminal patients experienced by the primary healthcare sector.
METHODS: A questionnaire about treatment and nursing care problems related to urinary diversion was sent to general practitioners (GPs) and district nurse units (DNUs) that had been in contact with 1 of 71 patients who died following cystectomy in a 5-year period. The patients had 1 of 3 types of urinary diversion: ileal conduit (IC), Indiana pouch (IP), or Hautmann orthotopic neobladder (NB).
RESULTS: Both GPs and DNUs reported significant difference in problems associated with the 3 types of urinary diversion favoring the IC (P = .049 and .025, respectively). However, clinical decisions about urinary diversion types are often based on incontinent versus continent diversions. When divided into continent versus incontinent diversions, the analysis revealed no differences in the number of problems (P = .31 and .052, respectively). Comparing IC and NB alone made the difference even less significant (P = .82 and .23, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that there are no major disadvantages with one type of urinary diversion when compared to the other as perceived by primary healthcare providers. Relevant and thorough information should be provided to GPs and DNUs in order to minimize problems with all forms of urinary diversion.