Authors

  1. Truex, Eleanor Shanklin MLIS, RN
  2. Spinner, Emily MSIS
  3. Hillyer, Jean MLS
  4. Ettien, A'Llyn MLIS
  5. Wade, Sarah MLS
  6. Calhoun, Courtney DNP, RN
  7. Wolf, Grace MLS
  8. Hedreen, Rebecca MLIS
  9. Heimlich, Layla MLIS
  10. Nickum, Annie MLS, BSN
  11. Vonderheid, Susan C. PhD, RN

Abstract

Background: Health sciences librarians and nursing journal contributors have expressed concern about the impact of using strict parameters when searching the literature.

 

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the use of strict search criteria (eg, 5-year rule, "nurse as author") by direct care nurses and nursing students.

 

Methods: Fourteen online focus groups were conducted with 54 participants: direct care nurses, health sciences librarians, nursing faculty, and nursing students. Nursing faculty and health sciences librarians were included as participants to add perspective to the origins and effects of the use of stringent search criteria.

 

Results: The majority of the nurses viewed the 5-year rule and nurse as author search limits favorably, while noting that a strict date range may hamper successful searching. Librarians viewed these search criteria more unfavorably but recognized the value of topic-appropriate search limits.

 

Conclusion: Reliance on strict limits can be detrimental to pertinent results; however, appropriate use is essential for relevant results. Pedagogy focused on searching the nursing literature needs to emphasize that limits are tools to be used judiciously.