There are 3 errors present in the article mentioned above. These errors have been noted below and the correct information noted in bold italics.

1. Abstract - Results section

Corrected text: Data from 348 and 375 pre- and postintervention hospital visits, respectively, were analyzed.

2. Abstract - Results section

Corrected text: Compared with preintervention, the odds of implementing the 10mWT were 9.7 times greater (odds ratio [OR]= 9.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8, 19.8), and of implementing the 6MWT were 3.5 times greater (OR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.0, 5.9), post-intervention, after adjusting for hospital setting, ambulation ability, presence of aphasia and cognitive impairment, and provider-level clustering.

3. Table 3:

The dependent variable indicated in the column header for model 4 and 5 should be switched. Our description of the results of modeling are correct in the text and the full corrected table, with corrected column headers in bold italics is reprinted below.

REFERENCE