ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previously, the authors implemented a "fast-track protocol" in the Netherlands to shorten the time to referral for patients when diagnostic testing was deemed necessary given suspicion of underlying pathology preventing wound healing. This subanalysis of the cross-sectional study presents the cost reduction of using that fast-track protocol.
METHODS: The cross-sectional study data were collected at the Alrijne Wound Centre between January 2017 and January 2018 and included patients from two general practitioner practices and a large home-care organization who had a new occurrence of wounds. The cost-effectiveness analysis consisted of an analysis of the mean reduction in care, wound dressing materials, and reduction in unnecessary hospital referrals.
RESULTS: In 2017, a total of 415 patients received wound care of the general practitioners or home-care organization. By using the "fast-track" protocol, costs were reduced in all areas. After extrapolation, the minimum mean cost reduction in wound care was [Euro sign]129,949,638; on wound dressings, it was [Euro sign]2,623,920, and on the reduction of unnecessary hospital referrals, the average recovery was [Euro sign]2,436,000.
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt triage, analyses, and treatment of underlying causes by specialized doctors in a multidisciplinary setting offer enormous potential for cost savings. The conservative estimate is that approximately [Euro sign]135,000,000 to [Euro sign]293,000,000 can be saved in annual healthcare costs in the Netherlands using this protocol.