Keywords

discharge instructions, heart failure, 30-day readmission

 

Authors

  1. Hoke, Linda M. PhD, RN, CCNS, AGCNS, CCRN, WCC, FCNS
  2. Bradway, Christine PhD, CRNP, FAAN, AGSF
  3. Trotta, Rebecca L. PhD, RN
  4. Wald, Joyce DO, FACC

Abstract

Background and Objective: Heart failure (HF) readmissions will continue to grow unless we have a better understanding of why patients with HF are readmitted. Our purpose was to gain an understanding, from the patients' perspective, of how patients with HF viewed their discharge instructions and how they felt when they got home and were then readmitted in less than 30 days.

 

Methods and Results: We used a qualitative descriptive approach using semistructured interviews with 22 patients with HF. Most participants had multimorbidities, were classified as New York Heart Association class III (n = 13) with reduced ejection fraction (n = 20), and were on home inotrope therapy (n = 13). The overarching theme that emerged was that these participants were sick, tired, and symptomatic. Additional categories within this theme highlight discharge instructions as being clear and easily understood; rich descriptions of physical, emotional, and other symptoms leading up to readmission; and reports of daily activities including what "good" and "not good" days looked like. Moreover, when participants experienced an exacerbation of their HF symptoms, they were sick enough to be readmitted to the hospital.

 

Conclusion: Our findings confirm ongoing challenges with a complex group of sick patients with HF, with the majority on home inotropes with reduced ejection fraction, who developed an unavoidable progression of their illness and subsequent hospital readmission.