Abstract
The high failure rate (46%) of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is well-documented. There is limited research examining the effect of forces/pulls on PIVC complications. New breakaway connectors called force-activated separation devices (FASD) separate when a damaging force is placed on a PIVC. In a randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned 1:1 to a control group receiving PIVC standard of care (SOC) or SOC with FASD added to the catheter. The primary outcome was total mechanical complications requiring a PIVC restart. Secondary outcomes were delay in therapy, PIVC restarts, and adverse events. Outcomes were compared in an intention-to-treat analysis (N = 302) and per-protocol analysis (N = 287). There were less total mechanical complications in FASD compared with SOC (22 vs 41, respectively; P < .01). The treatment group was a predictor of total delay in therapy (minutes), indicating a greater estimated total delay in therapy in SOC than FASD (B = 69.53; 95% CI, 28.32-110.73; P = .001). There were more adverse events in SOC (127) than FASD (76; P = .001). Results were consistent in the per-protocol analysis. Use of a FASD showed a reduction in total mechanical complications. These results support use of the FASD as a safer and time-saving alternative to current SOC.