Abstract
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Carotid artery web may cause ischemic stroke and affects a vulnerable population of mostly younger patients. Multiple treatment options and lack of diagnostic consensus can cause confusion and reduce the likelihood to follow the recommended follow-up care. METHODS: We reviewed relevant literature using the following keywords: carotid web, CW, risk factors, stroke, treatments, education, incidence, prevalence, diagnostics, and nursing care. RESULTS: CW is commonly missed or misdiagnosed, which has led to scarce prevalence data. It has been reported to potentially represent approximately 0.5% of all ischemic strokes; however, after appropriate workup of patients with no clear stroke etiology, as many as 9.4% to 37% were found to have CW. This fibrotic shelflike lesion in the internal carotid bifurcation leads to flow disruption and possible thrombus formation. Treatment options include dual antiplatelets and anticoagulation or more invasive options such as revascularization with surgical excision or stenting, but research remains limited on which could be most beneficial. CONCLUSION: With multiple options and the uncertainty of which are best, patients can be lost to follow-up because of confusion and stress. Involving neuroscience nurses in the education process of these patients may help facilitate understanding of this disease phenomenon and increase patient understanding and compliance.