Discourse analysis, thus, is essentially a contribution to the study of language "in use." - -Teun A. van Dijk (1985)

In this issue of Topics in Language Disorders, Issue Editor Dr. Davida Fromm has invited authors to provide information about advances in discourse analysis related to neurogenic communication disorders. The study of discourse is critical because as van Dijk (1985) states, examining various facets of discourse allows researchers and clinicians to best capture functional production of spoken (and written) language.

First, DeDe and Hoover (2021) use case studies of individuals with aphasia to illustrate the importance of selecting appropriate discourse measures using a person-centered approach. Next, Hengst and Sherrill (2021) discuss discourse analysis for people with complex communication needs who use augmentative and alternative communication within a theory of situated discourse analysis. Then, Steel et al. (2021) summarize the literature related to narrative discourse interventions for people with posttraumatic brain injury. Roberts et al. (2021) share findings from their large database of people with cerebrovascular disease related to a sequenced picture description task. Finally, to complete this well-rounded issue, Minga et al. (2021) provide an introduction to the RHDBank, which is a shared database that includes discourse samples of individuals with communication impairments following right hemisphere damage.

In summary, Davida Fromm and the authors of this issue provide guidance to researchers and clinicians wishing to expand their knowledge and use of a wide variety of discourse analysis approaches. These contributions will move the field toward an improved understanding of language in use.

-Sarah E. Wallace, PhD, CCC-SLP

-Gary A. Troia, PhD, CCC-SLP

Co-Editors

REFERENCES