INTRODUCTION
The images of nurses, physicians, and other frontline healthcare workers have overwhelmed many of us who helplessly sit on the sidelines of the COVID-19 pandemic feeling impotent to do what we do best, alleviate pain and suffering. The extreme exhaustion on the faces of our nursing colleagues gives us pause. We cannot help but see the overwhelming fatigue and, importantly, the facial dermatological manifestations of prolonged exposure to personal protective equipment (PPE), just one of multiple side effects of the relentless pressure to do more, care more, be more.
This View From Here focuses on PPE-related facial skin complications, in particular, mask dermatitis and approaches to its topical management. Clinical manifestations range from mild erythema, rashes, and swelling to more severe inflammatory pustules, maceration, and lichenification of the nasal bridge, forehead, and post-auricle areas that come into contact with the mask. Cosmesis is substantially altered, negatively affecting quality of life and potentially impeding patient care. Lan and colleagues1 conducted an online survey in January to February 2020 of nurses and physicians who worked in hospitals in Hubei, China; the prevalence of skin damage associated with the use of facial PPE was 97% (n = 526/542). Desquamation/peeling (70.3%) and dryness/tightness (62.2%) were the most commonly reported symptoms and signs, affecting predominantly the nasal bridge (83.1%), cheek, and forehead. Not surprisingly, those who wore facial PPE greater than 6 hours were more likely to experience skin damage than those who wore PPE for a shorter period of time. For example, if one wore an N95 mask, he or she experienced an odds ratio of 2.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.01), meaning the likelihood of experiencing some type of skin damage with wearing the N95 mask was slightly more than twice higher than providers who wore the same type of mask fewer than 6 hours.
We reviewed the literature, visited multiple Web sites, and reached out to our wound care and dermatology colleagues to obtain the latest prevention and treatment information on face mask dermatitis, also known as irritant contact dermatitis.2,3 We want to provide, whenever possible, evidence-based recommendations for the use of topical prevention and treatment approaches for irritant contact dermatitis associated with wearing of masks but acknowledge that our recommendations should be categorized best practice at this point (Table). Additional suggested readings are provided in the Box.
BOX 1. Additional Readings
1. Yan Y, Chen H, Chen L, Cheng B, et al. Consensus of Chinese experts on protection of skin and mucous membrane barrier for health-care workers fighting against coronavirus disease 2019. Dermatol Ther. 2020:e13310. doi:10.1111/dth.13310.
2. Zuo Y, Hua W, Luo Y, Li L. Skin reactions of N95 and medial masks among health care personnel: a self-report questionnaire survey in China. Contact Dermatitis. 2020:e13555. doi:10.1111/cod.13555.
We are aware that some are using polyurethane foam dressing to prevent PPE-related skin damage. We concur that these dressings may be placed under face shields that do not require a seal against the skin to prevent and treat areas of skin damage provided the dressing does not interfere with or compromise the seal of the mask (Figure).
REFERENCES