Keywords

home and ambulatory blood pressure, hypertensive cardiovascular damage

 

Authors

  1. Lin, Ting-Tse MD
  2. Juang, Jimmy Jyh-Ming MD, PhD
  3. Lee, Jen-Kuang MD, PhD
  4. Tsai, Chia-Ti MD, PhD
  5. Chen, Chen-Huan MD, PhD
  6. Yu, Wen-Chung MD, PhD
  7. Cheng, Hao-min MD, PhD
  8. Wu, Yen-Wen MD, PhD
  9. Chiu, Yu-Wei MD
  10. Kuo, Chi-Tai MD, PhD
  11. Chen, Jin-Jer MD, PhD
  12. Chen, Zhih-Cherng MD
  13. Chang, Wei-Ting MD
  14. Liu, Ping-Yen MD, PhD
  15. Chen, Po-wei MD
  16. Yen, Hsueh-Wei MD
  17. Chen, Ying-Chih MD
  18. Tseng, Wei-Kung MD, PhD
  19. Chiang, Fu-Tien MD, PhD
  20. Wu, Cho-Kai MD, PhD
  21. Taiwan Hypertension-Associated Cardiac Disease Consortium

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether home or ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was associated with preclinical hypertensive cardiovascular target organ damage (TOD).

 

Methods: We enrolled participants with prehypertension and stage 1 hypertension from 11 medical centers within the Taiwan hypertension-associated cardiac disease consortium. Recordings of clinical BP measurement, ambulatory BP monitoring for 24 hours, and home BP monitoring during morning and evening were made. The measured parameters of target organ damage included left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left atrial volume index (LAVI), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV).

 

Results: Data were collected from 561 study participants (mean age, 65.0 +/- 10.8 years; men, 61.3%). Morning and evening home BP values were slightly higher than the daytime and nighttime ABP values (difference for systolic morning-daytime/evening-nighttime, 7.3 +/- 14.2/11.3 +/- 18.5 mm Hg, P < .001; for diastolic, 5.4 +/- 9.4/7.3 +/- 12.1, P < .001). Daytime ambulatory (r = 0.114), nighttime ambulatory (r = 0.130), morning home (r = 0.310), and evening home (r = 0.220) systolic BPs (SBPs) were all associated with LVMI (all P < .05). The correlation coefficient was significantly greater for the relationship between daytime home SBP and LVMI than for the relationship between ambulatory SBP and LVMI (P < .01). The goodness of fit of the association between SBP and LVMI improved by adding home daytime SBP to the other SBPs (P < .001). Similar findings were observed for LAVI, but not for PWV.

 

Conclusion: These findings indicate that morning SBP assessed by home monitoring appears to be a better predictor than other BP measures to determine preclinical hypertensive cardiovascular damage in patients with early-stage hypertension.