Keywords

biological scaffolds, diabetic wound, extracellular matrix, regenerative medicine, urinary bladder matrix, wound healing

 

Authors

  1. Liu, Qinxin MD
  2. Wu, Mengfan MD, PhD
  3. Karvar, Mehran MD
  4. Aoki, Shimpo MD, PhD
  5. Endo, Yori MD
  6. Hamaguchi, Ryoko MD
  7. Ma, Chenhao MD, PhD, MSPH
  8. Matar, Dany Y.
  9. Orgill, Dennis P. MD, PhD
  10. Panayi, Adriana C. MD

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the various three-dimensional structures of bioscaffolds affect wound healing by investigating the efficacy of different porcine-derived urinary bladder matrix (UBM) structures in treating murine diabetic wound healing.

 

METHODS: The authors studied three different UBM structures: particulate (pUBM), one-layer freeze-dried sheet (fdUBM), and three-layer laminated sheet (lmUBM). Scanning electron microscopy images of the structures were used to calculate a wound-exposed surface-area-to-volume ratio. A 1.0 x 1.0-cm full-thickness dorsal wound was excised on 90 db/db mice. Mice were either untreated (blank, n = 15), treated with one UBM structure (pUBM, n = 15; fdUBM, n = 15; lmUBM, n = 15), or treated with a combination of either the one- or three-layer sheet over the particulate matrix (fdUBM + pUBM, n = 15; lmUBM + pUBM, n = 15). The authors obtained macroscopic images of the wounds and harvested tissues for analyses at multiple time points.

 

RESULTS: The surface area available to interact with the wound was highest in the pUBM group and lowest in the lmUBM group. Greater wound bed thickness was noted in the fdUBM, fdUBM + pUBM, and lmUBM groups compared with the blank group. Cellular proliferation was significantly higher in the fdUBM and fdUBM + pUBM groups than in the blank group. The lmUBM + pUBM group had the highest collagen deposition. The pUBM group induced significantly higher leukocyte infiltration compared with the lmUBM, lmUBM + pUBM, and blank groups. Microvessel density was highest in the fdUBM + pUBM group. Significant differences in the wound closure rate were noted between the blank group and the fdUBM and fdUBM + pUBM groups.

 

CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the three UBM bioscaffold structures highlighted differences in the wound-exposed surface area. Variations in wound healing effects, including collagen deposition, cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis, were identified, with combinations of the structures displaying synergistic effects. This study serves as a platform for future scaffold design and offers promising evidence of the benefits of combining various structures of scaffolds.