Abstract
AIM: The use of simulation training in neurocritical care is increasing. Yet, the pooled impact on patient and trainee outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review aims to determine the outcome measurements used after simulation training in neurocritical care and to synthesize the current evidence about the impact of simulation training on these outcomes. METHODS: A 3-step search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were composed of studies exploring simulation training in neurocritical care, published in English between 2000 and 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction, using standardized Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Meta-analysis was precluded because of clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nine relevant studies were found: 1 quality improvement project and 8 quasi-experimental studies. The overall quality of the relevant studies was moderate to high (61.1%–77.8%). Three types of outcome measurements for simulation in neurocritical care were identified: knowledge and clinical performance; confidence and comfort; and teamwork, communication, and leadership skills. Simulation training was associated with a significant improvement in knowledge and clinical performance, and confidence and comfort, but not in communication and leadership skills. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in trainees' outcomes was observed. The current literature includes significant heterogeneity in the methods of evaluating simulation outcomes, although no patient outcomes were observed. Investigating the effect of simulation in neurocritical care training on patient outcomes in future studies is warranted.