Abstract
The Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale was developed to improve the reliability of constipation diagnosis in non-toilet-trained children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of simplified Chinese versions of the Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale when used by parents, community doctors, pediatricians, and nurses. Photographs of the Scale were categorized into four categories (hard stools, formed stools, loose stools, and watery stools) and subjects assigned each photograph to a category. The study included two stages. In the first stage (n = 237 observers), percent correct allocations of the seven photographs ranged from 68.4% to 93.2%. We observed poorer recognition of the three hard stool items (77.4%, 85.8%, and 74.0%) than had been reported in the original Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale validity study (95.9%, 93.4%, and 96.2%). Because hard stool items were commonly miscategorized as formed stools (21.6%, 9.5%, and 26.0%), we modified the descriptors "hard stools" and "formed stools" into "dry/hard stools" and "formed loose stools," respectively, and examined the performance of the modified Chinese Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale in stage 2 of our study. The proportions of correct allocations of the three "hard stool" items in the modified Chinese Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale increased to 94.7%, 90.4%, and 84.6%, values that were statistically similar to those reported previously in the original Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale publisher. Renaming these categories to remove ambiguity in Chinese improved the identifiability of these items. The resultant Chinese Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale was found to be valid for use with Chinese observers.