Keywords

cardiac surgical procedures, cardiovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, systematic review, thoracic surgery

 

Authors

  1. Mulkey, Malissa A. PhD, RN
  2. Smith, Asa B. PhD, RN
  3. Wion, Rachel K. PhD, RN
  4. House, Sherita L. PhD, RN
  5. Wierenga, Kelly L. PhD, RN

Abstract

Background: More than 1 million individuals undergo cardiothoracic surgery for coronary artery bypass graft or valve repair/replacement annually in the United States. There is an increased risk of developing serious cognitive impairment post cardiothoracic surgery. Pharmacological interventions and surgical techniques were associated with improvements in cognitive function in previous systematic reviews. However, a gap in the literature exists regarding how nonpharmacological interventions can mitigate cognitive impairment in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

 

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce the detrimental effects of cardiac surgery on cognitive function in patients after cardiothoracic surgery.

 

Methods: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from January 2011 to February 2022.

 

Results: Nineteen studies were included in this review. Researchers defined cognitive impairment differently across studies. Various interventions were used to reduce cognitive impairment post cardiothoracic surgery, with the most common being remote ischemic limb conditioning. The interventions used to reduce cognitive impairment were heterogeneous in outcomes, measurements, and time of assessment, but only 2 interventions were associated with a reduction in cognitive impairment.

 

Conclusions: This review is a unique synthesis of the quality of interventions that address broader components of cognition. Researchers used various interventions to reduce cognitive impairment; the outcomes, instruments, and time interval for measurements were heterogeneous. Researchers should conduct future studies at multiple time intervals, using a comprehensive measure of cognitive impairment to better understand the impact of cognitive impairment interventions postoperatively.