Abstract
Quality of life (QOL) as an outcome for cancer treatment has been studied primarily in urban populations. Yet, descriptions of rural dwellers suggest that their perception of QOL may differ from that of their urban counterparts. The purpose of this study was to examine QOL in people with a cancer diagnosis of at least 1 month duration in two similar rural northeastern states. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT G) scale was completed by 344 respondents. The mean QOL score was 89.41 +/- 16.55. State of residence, gender, known recurrence, and marital status were significant predictors of QOL, explaining 18.3% of the variance in this study. Age, education level, income, type of cancer, living arrangements, and time since diagnosis were not predictive. The QOL scores in this rural sample were higher than those reported earlier for predominantly urban dwellers. Future research is needed to understand these differences.