Buy this article for $7.95

Have a coupon or promotional code? Enter it here:

When you buy this article you'll get access to the ePub version, a downloadable PDF, and the ability to print the full article.

Source:

Critical Care Nursing Quarterly

June 2013, Volume 36 Number 2 , p 169 - 173

Authors

  • A. W. van der Kooi MSc
  • J. H. M. Tulen PhD
  • M. M. J. van Eijk MD, PhD
  • A. W. de Weerd MD, PhD
  • M. J. G. van Uitert PhD
  • B. C. van Munster MD, PhD
  • A. J. C. Slooter MD, PhD

Abstract

Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The criterion standard for sleep monitoring, polysomnography, is impractical in ICU. Actigraphy (a wrist watch indicating amount of sleep) proved to be a good alternative in non-ICU patients, but not in prolonged mechanically ventilated patients, probably due to ICU-acquired weakness. Short-stay ICU patients do not suffer from ICU-acquired weakness. However, the accuracy of actigraphy is unknown in these patients. Therefore, we compared actigraphy to polysomnography in short-stay ICU patients. Sleep measurements were conducted in 7 postcardiothoracic surgery patients. The sensitivity (percentage of actigraphy data that agreed with sleep determined using polysomnography) and specificity (percentage of actigraphy data that agreed with awake determined using polysomnography) were calculated. The result showed that actigraphy underestimated the amount of wake time and overestimated the amount of sleep. The median specificity for actigraphy was always less than 19% and sensitivity more than 94%. Therefore, actigraphy is not reliable for sleep monitoring in short-stay ICU patients.

To continue reading, buy this article for just $7.95.

Have a coupon or promotional code? Enter it here: